Writing a cochrane systematic review handbook

Broad perspective on topic, no specified search strategy, significant bias issues, may not evaluate quality of evidence Systematic reviews: Review authors are welcome to visit the editorial base at any stage. All authors should consult the Handbook for guidance on the methods used in Cochrane systematic reviews.

From the outset, review authors should be aware of their responsibility to update and maintain their reviews after publication.

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Writing a Cochrane Review Titles All review titles must be formally registered with the editorial base. A number of factors may motivate authors to undertake a systematic review.

Writing a Cochrane Review

The current complete version of the Handbook is 5. After finishing your review, it is again submitted for peer review, before eventual publication. The review authors then have three weeks to revise and resubmit the review. Our Glossary includes definitions of methodological and organisational terms as used by Cochrane.

There are currently no substantive changes to methods in these chapters. Further details of the expectations of author teams can be found here: The Handbook includes guidance on the standard methods applicable to every review planning a review, searching and selecting studies, data collection, risk of bias assessment, statistical analysis, GRADE and intepreting resultsas well as more specialised topics non-randomized studies, adverse effects, economics, patient-reported outcomes, individual patient data, prospective meta-analysis, qualitative research, reviews in public health and overviews of reviews.

Further details of the expectations of author teams can be found here: The editorial base may also consider withdrawing a review from publication if it considers it to be outdated. Furthermore, Cochrane tries to disseminate the evidence collected in its reviews as widely as possible.

The Joanna Briggs Institute has an excellent guide that will help in writing the review. If an update involves no further analysis or change of results, it may not need to be refereed by referees. There is variation across Cochrane Review Groups in policies regarding when and if updated reviews go through the process of full editorial review.

Please ensure that when your review is submitted it is of publishable standard and suitable for peer review by experts in the field. After completion of the updating process, the review should be submitted to the editorial team for further processing.

Click here for selected new chapters from Handbook v5. Cochrane's handbook is another good reference. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) will also help in writing the review.

You can use this tool from Theta Collaborative to create a PRISMA flow chart of your study; this guide from Glasgow Caledonian University has more information. All Cochrane systematic reviews are first registered as titles with a Cochrane Review Group.

Registering your title is important to prevent duplication of effort with other authors, and to make sure your topic is appropriate for a Cochrane review. What is a systematic review? A systematic review is a literature overview that attempts to answer a well-defined question in a rigorous way.

The term ‘systematic’ indicates that special care was paid to the methods used for searching, selecting, analyzing, and reporting of the data. All Cochrane systematic reviews are first registered as titles with a Cochrane Review Group. Registering your title is important to prevent duplication of effort with other authors, and to make sure your topic is appropriate for a Cochrane review.

Part of the Cochrane Interactive Learning course on Conducting an Intervention Review, this module introduces you to what systematic reviews are and why they are useful. This module describes the various types and preferred format of review questions, and outlines the. The Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions provides a practical and feasible six-step framework for developing and reporting a systematic review for preventive interventions.

Writing a cochrane systematic review handbook
Rated 5/5 based on 60 review
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions | Cochrane Training